Susan Sarandon Hates America
Susan Sarandon wants the next American presidential election to be monitored by international observers. She said the 2004 election was so fraudulent that we need oversight — just like third world countries.
She said “I believe our next election should be monitored by international entities, just like it happened in Haiti and Iraq. The last one was an embarrassment. Everybody knew there was fraud, but nothing was done about it. In some states there were more votes than people able to vote.”
Aw, come on, it can’t happen here.
About the Bush Administration, she said “I think we’ve never been as close to George Orwell’s ‘1984’ as before. We live in a society where individual rights and legality are definitely threatened and that’s scary.”
Susan Sarandon is already a favorite punching bag for rightwing bloggers. The wingnuts are probably gonna have a field day with this.
posted by Tom Harper @ 12:13 AM
10 Comments:
Unfortunately, she's right. How can you beat the Republican/Diebold Party?
J. Marquis: I definitely agree with her. I think we should have paper ballots available at every voting precinct, and/or be monitored by international observers.
God, I can only imagine what the Echo Machine sounds like today.
I'm sure mikesamerica.blogspot.com is all over that.
You want to check out crazy, check out that nutcase..
I've tried to debate over there, but you just get yelled at for being a "moonbat", whatever that is..
Mike V.: I'm sure the rightwing noise machine is having a field day with this. I haven't done any blogsurfing yet today but she's one of their favorite targets, along with Michael Moore and Cindy Sheehan. I've been to Mike's America (not recently); it's like talking to a wall trying to debate anything over there. Some of the regulars over there are even worse than he is, especially a woman with "Democrat" as part of her screen name.
Wow, I just checked out that blog... you guys are right... he's pretty zany to say the least. He and Tom Delay deserve one another.
GTL: I just now looked at Mike's America for the first time in awhile. The posts I looked at, everyone was agreeing with each other. But if you make one disagreeing comment there, you'll get ten pitbulls ganging up on you. It's at least as bad as Cao's Blog.
(not to go on and on about that weirdo) but if you look at that picture of a younger Mike with Reagan, that photo really creeps me out.
there is no "debate" there.
they all jerk each other off and scream moonbat at anyone else.
now, I realize that a lot of US stick together and post and read each other's blogs, but I KNOW that I allow and will debate anyone that stumbles in on my own.
Mike V.: Yeah, I'm all in favor of debate and dissent. If somebody wants to discuss something civilly, I'll gladly discuss it. If they stoop to namecalling, I'll stoop too.
Mike's America and Cao's Blog are the worst as far as that gang mentality goes. They must have that same "all on one, one on all" motto that the Hell's Angels have. Uncommon Sense is like that too, but at least the posts and comments over there are intelligent and interesting.
Poor Susan. But that's what she should expect from simply expressing an opinion nowadays.
Snave: Yup, that's how it is these days. Speak your mind and get swiftboated.
Post a Comment
<< Home