Who Hijacked Our Country

Saturday, January 12, 2008

Pakistan Has Weapons of Mass Destruction!

Those swarthy bastards have something to hide, I just know it. I thought Pakistan was our friend. Apparently not. Maybe Israel is our only friend. Well that's just FINE! It’s us two against the world. We can take ‘em!

Those backstabbing Pakistanis won't let us into their country to look for Osama bin Laden?!? The neverending search for Osama is the lynchpin of our Plan for World Domination Global War on Terror. We don’t want to find him, of course (is he even still alive?). We just need to keep pointing to him, keep the population riled up, and keep pretending we’re still looking for him.

This famous lesson from Hermann Goering has been our inspiration for the past seven years:

“Naturally the common people don't want war: Neither in Russia, nor in England, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, IT IS THE LEADERS of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is TELL THEM THEY ARE BEING ATTACKED, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. IT WORKS THE SAME IN ANY COUNTRY.”

And Boy Howdy does it work! Yeehaw! Whenever anybody questions why we’re occupying so many countries and bankrupting our own government, we have our Talking Points at the ready. “9/11.” “Soft on Terrorism!” “Surrender Monkey!” “Why do you hate your own country?”

Works every time. Those liberals are scared shitless to say anything. They know we’ll bombard them with names and innuendos, and they can't seem to think of any comebacks. So they just cower silently. Teeheeheeheehee.

But the cornerstone of this plan is: we need a villain. Eastasia! Oceana! Osama bin Laden! We’re gonna find you Goddamnit! Wanted Dead or Alive! You can run but you can't hide!

And now Pakistan is wrecking the Game Plan by saying we can't send troops into their country to search for, uh, the Cisco Ki— I mean, the Reichstag, uhh, oh come on…Osama bin Laden, that’s it. Pervez Musharraf actually said “I challenge anybody coming into our mountains. They would regret that day.”

What?!?!?!?! After everything we've done for those towelheads, and this is how they pay us back??? That does it. They're in our crosshairs now! Don’t worry, it'll be a cakewalk.

Labels: , , , , ,


Blogger LET'S TALK said...

Have they been leading Bush along all this time?

Pervez Musharraf, actually threaten anyone who brought troops into their mountains to take a look see for Osama, what a change!

January 12, 2008 at 8:57 PM  
Blogger Tom Harper said...

Let's Talk: That's the trouble with having a foreign policy that meddles in every corner of the world. We keep forming these alliances and "friendships" with other countries, then the sands shift and our "friends" become enemies. Bin Laden was our ally when we were supporting the Afghan rebels in the early '80s. Saddam Hussein used to be our ally against Iran. If we didn't keep manipulating the world and forging all these alliances in volatile regions, we wouldn't keep getting into these awkward positions.

January 12, 2008 at 9:48 PM  
Blogger Jen Clark said...

The entire issue is strange and tough to understand because Musharraf and Bush know damn well that Osama bin-Laden has likely been dead since around mid-December 2001.

I didn't just pull that out of my ass. Before she died, Benazir Bhutto did a TV interview where she told David Frost who her assassin would be. From the second she stepped back into Pakistan, she was a dead woman walking... and she knew it.

She said her assassin would be a "key figure in security... a former General". I will posting information tomorrow on my blog that will indicate that the person she was referring to is General Mahmood Ahmad, the former director of the Pakistani ISI (their version of the CIA). One of the clues she gave was that the assassin (Ahmad) had "dealings" with "Omar Sheikh, the man who murdered Osama bin-Laden". The video is posted at my site (the article is listed under the Must Know Info). You can hear watch the interview for yourself.

If you check out the timeline, this would indicate that Osama bin-Laden had to be killed before February 5th, 2001 as Omar Sheikh has been in Pakistani custody since that day for the murder of Daniel Pearl. There is more evidence, which I provide in that blog post, that pin points his death to the 16th or 17th of December 2001.

I'm working on a post that I hope to have ready Monday morning that reveals even more ugliness than what I have just described. It appears that the Pakistani government is not the only group in Pakistan and elsewhere that has access to nuclear weapons. It looks like people within our very own government have been taking bribes in return for nuclear secrets, if not the actual bombs. It looks like Turkey is not our friend either. More on that coming soon, as I'm not done reading, but chew on the bin-Laden thing for a while.

January 12, 2008 at 10:08 PM  
Blogger Tom Harper said...

Jen: Hi, thanks for stopping by. Interesting hard-hitting blog you've got; I'll have to look at it a lot more.

I hope nobody gets you mixed up with Jenn of the Jungle, another blogger who's somewhere to the right of Torquemada and Ghengis Khan; and she comments everywhere.

I'm pretty skeptical in general (of the Right and Left) but I certainly don't disbelieve anything you've said. Our government has weaved such a tangled web of deceit, who even knows what's true.

Like I said, I just took a quick glimpse at your blog, but I'll be back. You've got your finger on the pulse (or whatever the right metaphor is). There's so much going on underneath the surface. It's not pretty to look at, but we've gotta look and be informed.

January 12, 2008 at 11:57 PM  
Blogger Mile High Pixie said...

Interesting--Musharraf isn't willing to let us come in and look for Osama, and I have to wonder if it's because he doesn't feel like having his country leveled whenwe get our drawers in a wad about something. I wonder if people realize how long they've been manipulated: we don't even need Osama to be attached again, we've made plenty of enemies by invading Iraq that other disaffected young Muslim youth will do his job for him.

January 13, 2008 at 1:28 PM  
Blogger Tom Harper said...

Mile High Pixie: Yeah, who does Pakistan think they are, a sovereign nation or something? We need to teach those peasants a lesson. The entire world is America's backyard, and anybody who doesn't learn that the easy way will have to learn it the hard way :)

January 13, 2008 at 1:57 PM  
Blogger Snave said...

Whether dead or alive, Bin Laden is too great a bogeyman for the Bush administration to get rid of him. As long as they can keep people frightened with the idea that Osama is still out there somewhere (he could be anywhere!), plotting to kill more of us, they can use that fear to sway people into submission. And the Pixie is certainly correct... even if Bin Laden is dead, there are enough new enemies created by Bush and Cheney that our government should be able to keep us scared into submission for decades.

As for Perv Musharraf, I think he sucks. Then again, I think it might be worse to have a religious fundamentalist government in Pakistan, in charge of their nookyuler weapons. But hey, wait... haven't we had a goofy religious fundamentalist in charge of our country's nukes for the last seven years? Arrrrgh...

January 13, 2008 at 8:33 PM  
Blogger Tom Harper said...

Snave: Yup, bin Laden is the best bogey man this administration has ever had. Even if he's still alive, he's probably more of a figurehead than anything else. I still have to check out Jen's post about bin Laden being assassinated a few months after 9/11. I wouldn't doubt it for a minute.

And like you said, we create new terrorist recruits every time we invade a country and "destroy a village in order to save it."

January 13, 2008 at 8:47 PM  
Blogger Candace said...

No, no, no, Tom - you've got it all wrong - Pakistan is our friend. IRAN is greatest terrorist threat in the whole wide world. Do try to keep up.

January 14, 2008 at 10:33 AM  
Blogger Tom Harper said...

Candace: Aw gee, it's so hard to keep track. Iraq used to be our ally against Iran, then Iraq was our enemy and we had to liberate their people and execute their dictator. And Pakistan was helping us in our War on Tur, and now they aren't any more. I get confused.

January 14, 2008 at 11:10 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey bastard i'm a pakistani. we don't allow u to enter in our country. if u do that we'll put resistance against u

February 11, 2008 at 1:44 AM  
Blogger Jen Clark said...

Wow, Tom. Looks like you've caught the attention of the world!

Don't worry, anonymous. You're safe for about another year. Our president is still trying to attack Iran for no reason and still thinks your dictator is swell.

But you may want to pressure your own government to stop A.Q. Khan from selling nuclear weapons materials on the black market. Our next president, if that is a Democrat, and just about the rest of the world is not ok with that.

February 11, 2008 at 10:15 AM  
Blogger Tom Harper said...

Jen: Cool, I'm moving up in the world :)

I just assumed that comment was a crank comment, but who knows. I think Pakistan should be safe for awhile from a U.S. attack. If Venezuela cuts off our oil, like they're threatening to do, they'll probably move to the top of our shitlist.

February 11, 2008 at 10:58 AM  
Blogger Jen Clark said...

It's sick that we actually have a running "Must attack soon" list.

February 11, 2008 at 11:01 AM  
Blogger Tom Harper said...

Yup, it's sick. But that's the way it's been for the past 7 years; and probably a lot longer than that.

February 11, 2008 at 11:08 AM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home